Print This Post Print This Post

Would an East Tennessee Republican running for state Senate lift certain information from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign Web site and pass it off as his own?

Language in certain sections of Mike Faulk’s state Senate Web site did appear very similar and identical in some spots to the Obama campaign’s Web site.  

For example, Faulk’s  ”Get Involved” section did begin with the following next to the header “What to expect”:

“It will take time to build the campaign’s operation, and the need for volunteers with certain skills or in certain locations will emerge earlier than others.”

Now, this from Obama’s Web site next to the header “What to expect”:

“It will take time to build the campaign’s operation, and the need for volunteers with certain skills or in certain locations will emerge earlier than others.”

Faulk, an attorney from Church Hill, Tenn., is almost assuredly running against former Republican turned Independent Mike Williams next year.

Credit goes to Volunteer Voters, a local Nashville blog, for discovering the similarities.

The Tennessee Democratic Party followed late this afternoon with a press release bashing Faulk for “plagiarizing” Obama.

Gray Sasser, the Democratic Party’s state chairman, issued the following statement:

“I’m absolutely thrilled that Mike Faulk has taken Barack Obama’s message to heart.

 ”Since Republican Mike Faulk is willing to take the language of Senator Obama and use it for his website, I hope he will make an official endorsement shortly.

  “The Tennessee Democratic Party is not endorsing anyone in the Democratic presidential primary, but maybe some East Tennessee Republicans are willing to make such an endorsement.”

As of the TNDP’s news release, Faulk had edited the “Donate” section of his Web site that appeared similar to Obama’s.

Since then, he has edited the “Get Involved” section quoted above to include what appears to be original material.

Big question for Mike Faulk: Why?

Comments

4 Responses to “So weird it could only be Tennessee politics”

  1. Volunteer Voters » Sasser & Co. Going To Bat For Williams? on August 14th, 2007 5:10 pm

    [...] concerted Democratic effort to defend the seat of Mike Williams against his former party? UPDATE: John Rodgers covers the saga. Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share [...]

  2. Elrod on August 14th, 2007 7:40 pm

    Why? Answer: laziness. Faulk is a political neophyte and figured he could cut corners with his campaign website. Either he starts to take seriously the hardship of campaigning or he will get slaughtered by Williams who, despite his partisan apostasy, actually knows how run a a campaign.

    I’ll be driving through Maynardville tomorrow on my way to Cumberland Gap. I’ll be sure to allow myself a chuckle on the way through.

  3. Faulk’s Faux Pas « DeMarCaTionVille on August 15th, 2007 12:29 pm

    [...] The Faulk campaign later edited the wording but only after the “flaw” had been picked up via reports or links by Michael Silence, Bob Krumm, Bill Hobbs and John Rodgers. [...]

  4. Volunteer Voters » Much Ado About Not Alot on August 15th, 2007 12:43 pm

    [...] breaks down the dustup yesterday over the similarities between the Faulk for Senate website and the Obama for President web platform: As a former blogger, I am [...]

Comments Policy: The City Paper does not moderate comments before they appear on Nashville City Blogs and bears no responsibility or liability for comments posted by our readers. We do use an automatic spam filter and a dirty-words scrubber to screen out foul language. Comments with more than three hyperlinks may be automatically rejected as spam. Please stay on topic and play nice. Foul language and personal attack are not welcome here and egregious violations may result in your comment being deleted.

Leave a Reply