Print This Post Print This Post

There’s no nice way to describe how Metro Council looked at its meeting last night when it was voting on BL2008-203.

Forget whether or not Council increased the odds of Department of Justice finding that Metro has violated two federal land use acts. Forget the fact that it went against Metro Law Director Sue Cain’s recommendation that it make a good faith effort to comply with federal law (it’s rare for Metro Council to not follow Metro Law’s recommendations). Forget the fact that the 20-15 vote got at-large Councilman Jerry Maynard so worked up he tried to invoke an obscure Council rule to get the body to re-vote on the matter (an objection from District 22 Councilman Eric Crafton shot that motion down).

Forget all that.. Metro Council just looked downright unprepared.

“If you don’t pay attention to what your attorney says, you’re more than often going to get in trouble,” One Council member said.

One Council member, who asked to remain anonymous, said the body looked “the worst it has since being elected” simply for the fact that it was blatantly uneducated on the topic.

“And I’m not sure whose fault that is,” the Council member. “The Mayor’s office didn’t do a very good job of educating us or taking a stance.”

As the vote was being debated, Council members scrambled around the chamber trying to argue with one another for or against the resolution. District 4 Councilman Michael Craddock gave an impassioned rant that at one point raged against the federal government and at another suggested Councilman Rip Ryman deserves a medal. Suffice it to say, Council looked largely unprepared and unaware of the seriousness of the issue.

“I’d say we were mostly unaware,” the Council member said. “We didn’t even get a copy of the Department of Justice letter about the investigation until we arrived for the meeting.”

And when the possible repercussions into the DOJ investigation include having Metro’s federal education dollars frozen, it’s obviously a weighty issue. Not to mention that Metro has already all but admitted it violated the Fair Housing Act when it entered into a damages-only trial with Teen Challenge.

It bears mentioning that the City Paper has reported on the DOJ investigation four times since it began in February.

And don’t think the matter is going away soon. Next week Ryman gets interviewed by the DOJ, the Teen Challenge lawsuit is about to be settled, and other land use issues like Men of Valor are coming down the pipeline.

Comments

2 Responses to “Council at its worst”

  1. Somebody Didn’t Do Their Homework : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee on May 7th, 2008 3:18 pm

    [...] Nate Rau pens an excellent piece amplifying his story on how the Metro Council of Davidson County decided to vote to keep in place zoning ordinance that have the city under Depart of Justice investigation: Forget whether or not Council increased the odds of Department of Justice finding that Metro has violated two federal land use acts. Forget the fact that it went against Metro Law Director Sue Cain’s recommendation that it make a good faith effort to comply with federal law (it’s rare for Metro Council to not follow Metro Law’s recommendations). Forget the fact that the 20-15 vote got at-large Councilman Jerry Maynard so worked up he tried to invoke an obscure Council rule to get the body to re-vote on the matter (an objection from District 22 Councilman Eric Crafton shot that motion down). [...]

  2. Denver Schimming on June 11th, 2008 11:54 am

    As a proud resident of Goodlettsville, I continue to be appalled and embarrassed at the actions of my Councilman Rip Ryman and Councilman Michael Craddock in regards to their blatant discrimination against an organization like Teen Challenge. This “not in my backyard” mentality by these self-serving Metro officials not only furthers the stereotype of people with broken lives that long to get their lives turned around, but shows a lack of personal responsibility to the very people they are suppose to represent. And with Councilman Craddock representing a district with one of Metro’s highest crime rates, one would think he would welcome a proven organization that is totally about helping people become productive again. One would think.

Comments Policy: The City Paper does not moderate comments before they appear on Nashville City Blogs and bears no responsibility or liability for comments posted by our readers. We do use an automatic spam filter and a dirty-words scrubber to screen out foul language. Comments with more than three hyperlinks may be automatically rejected as spam. Please stay on topic and play nice. Foul language and personal attack are not welcome here and egregious violations may result in your comment being deleted.

Leave a Reply